“Term limits are critical to fixing what’s wrong with Washington, D.C.,” the Texas Republican said in a statement after introducing the bill last week. Terms served by members prior to the bill’s enactment would not count toward the proposed term limitations, which means that if the bill were to be passed by this Congress, Cruz would not be term limited until 2036. House from serving more than three two-year terms. senators from serving more than 12 years. The bill is a constitutional amendment that would prevent U.S. Ted Cruz reintroduced a bill last week to limit senators from serving more than two six-year terms, even as he stands by plans to run for his third. But after today’s blowup on content moderation, further changes will have to wait for another day.U.S. Last minute changes were made to the bill that would provide more transparency over how news organizations would use the money to support journalists. They argued that the JCPA would undermine online content moderation and favor large media conglomerates while doing little to ensure that journalists see pay increases. “Historically, antitrust exemptions have not accomplished beneficial goals,” the groups wrote in a letter to committee leaders this week. The bigger picture: The JCPA is part of a yearslong push in Congress designed to boost flagging journalism revenues while also taking on the market power of the world’s largest technology companies.īut the legislation faced broad opposition from an unusual coalition of tech lobbyists, progressive advocates and libertarian groups. " would rather pull their bill entirely than advance it with my proposed protections for Americans from unfair online censorship.” ![]() “What happened today was a huge victory for the First Amendment and free speech,” Cruz said in a statement. Once content moderation issues were introduced in the discussions, she said, news companies would have to walk away because they could no longer rely on the antitrust exemption for collective bargaining. Klobuchar warned that Cruz’s amendment would give online platforms a “get out of jail free card” by presenting an “obvious opportunity for gamesmanship” in negotiations with news publishers. The slim margin highlights the difficulty Democrats have with passing legislation in a 50-50 Senate.Īn aide to Senator Kennedy said “The senator made it clear ahead of markup that he was open to hearing out amendments.” “The agreement we had was blown up,” she said, before withdrawing the bill from consideration. Kennedy’s stance took Klobuchar by surprise. John Kennedy (R-La.) - an original co-sponsor of the bill - voted for Cruz’s amendment with his fellow Republicans. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) abstained from voting by proxy and was absent, having contracted Covid while visiting India, giving Republicans a majority on the committee. The blowup: Cruz’s amendment passed 11-10 along partisan lines. “You should not be negotiating on content moderation and how you are going to censor substantive content.” “If you’re negotiating, you ought to be negotiating on the ostensible harm this bill is directed at, which is the inability to get revenues from your content,” Cruz said. ![]() ![]() “What is preeminent to me is whether this bill is going to increase or decrease censorship,” Cruz said, nodding to the long-held notion among conservatives that tech platforms unfairly limit the reach of right-wing content online. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) that would keep antitrust restrictions in place for news organizations if they are negotiating with tech platforms about how or whether to moderate certain types of content. But a flurry of amendments were still offered Thursday - including one from Sen. The amendment: The bill under consideration at Thursday’s Senate Judiciary Committee markup was the product of months of negotiations, and had already been altered significantly from its initial introduction last year.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |